I believe that dissent is patriotic. I also believe that a high concentration of the people who attend demonstrations like these are clinically nuts (certainly not all of them, to be fair).
I just got back from taking a bunch of photos from the war protest taking place over at Lake Eola. The idea of the protest itself is completely fine by me. The peaceful expression of what is an extremely emotional issue is why we're so lucky to live here. It provokes conversation and discussion. It encourages people to research their thoughts and educate themselves. It serves as a mechanism to drive voter participation. Without protest, without that sense of "cognitive dissonance", we'd endanger the conversation and discourse that's so desperately needed in this country.
The thing is, for every parent who has suffered the loss of a child, for every pacifist who doesn't believe in violence, for every student who disagrees with our foreign policy, there are a handful of people who haven't cut their hair since 1959 and look like they're stoned out of their minds. Then you get the absurd Vietnam-vets-were-baby-killers crowd, the increasingly ridiculous 9-11 truther crowd (side note: Bill Mayher is right, 4 mins in), and the straight up we-hate-america folks. Everyone has the right to peaceful assembly, but the presence of some of these stereotypes truly undermines any reasonable effort these protesters have at being taken seriously.
"Bush = Hitler," really? Don't you see how that makes you come across as not only ignorant of world history, but also as a little bit looney? On one hand, we have Hitler. The definition of all that is evil. A murderer of tens of millions of people. Someone hell bent on the complete domination of Europe by a largely inferior Germany and smart enough to have had a realistic chance of it until the rest of the world came together in their own defense. The man was systematically attempting to erase an entire race of people. On the other hand, we have Bush. He responded to an attack that took place on domestic soil in a controversial way after he was given a blank check by a dual-party congress elected (and re-elected) by the American people. We're not sure if he can read.Yeah. I can see how the two are similar. Why don't we all listen to your thoughts on foreign policy?
I admire most of the folks who braved the rain this afternoon to come downtown. I admire the counter-protesters who did the same. I can't wait for the day in the future when so much of the confusion and the pain surrounding 9/11 and its aftermath has been resolved. I just wish the current state of the world wasn't such a breeding ground for conspiracy, conjecture, hyperbole and cynicism. People forget that in some countries, criticizing the government would be enough to have them thrown in jail. People forget that while they're complaining about the rain that came during their protest, volunteer soldiers are fighting overseas for a country that they love.
I hope those carrying these anti-Bush/anti-America signs are at least able to recognize the irony.


Comments...
(Page 1)1. What a thoughtful summary - thanks for sharing. The answers aren't easy but, as you say, there is reason to be thankful that we have the freedom to try and find them in our own way.
9:42AM on Oct 28th 2007 by Laura Guitar
2. I went to Orlando from Miami to take part in the protest with my kids and a friend from school.
Bush's policies, the changes taking place after 9/11, they scare me. As a Cuban-American, understanding the lack of freedoms the Cuban people have (my grandfather was a political prisoner), I am sensitive to what I believe are our inalienable rights, our human rights as part of the human race, freedom of the press, and everything else this country has stood for in the past (albeit, hypocritically at times when it came to deal with other countries and its intrests abroad).
The war in Iraq was illegal and immoral. We were lied to by this administration, and perhaps our Congress. I don't ask you to believe me, but I do ask you to look for it yourself. Google, Colin Powell, wmds in Iraq, Saddam Husein's connection with Al-Qaeda.
The Patriot Act, the wiretapping of American citizens without a warrant, extraordinary rendition (the picking up of terrorist suspects any where in the world by CIA), torture of prisoners, the holding of "suspected terrorists" indefinetly without charges (some of which are American citizens), the inability to take this admistration to court for its (suspected) abuses... because of course this will endanger our "national security", the idea that the US can go at it alone in the world, that it doesn't have to abide by rules that were set up to prevent abuses from happening .... all this scares me. People that believe that we can't lose our freedoms simply because they're gauranteed by the Constitution, need to look at what's been happening, what the administration has attempted, and what it has accomplished.
My father told me once that freedom wasn't free, meaning we had to understand those freedoms, defend them, and be willing to die for them. I've heard that line recently being used by people who support this administration's policies, except, they seem to argue that we shouldn't question our government because questioning can undermine the government's attempt to protect us against a terrorist threat in which thousands of Americans will die. Does anyone see an irony here?
2:48PM on Oct 28th 2007 by Sandra Soler
3. I'm closing the comments down.
I don't have time to moderate all the random nut jobs who troll the web for places to spew their hate and ignorance. Sorry to the few folks who had actual intelligent discussion to offer (Laura, Sandra, I left your comments intact! thank you.). Maybe next time.
(p.s., omg maybe Kennedy was killed by 9/11 truthers in time machines?!)
5:27PM on Oct 29th 2007 by Alex Rudloff